ok I've given this a few tries now. I know that you can't use this extender with the aperture wide open. Despite trying various settings I've found getting a clear image from it very difficult, you need to up the aperture to have half a chance, which results in having to up the iso even on the...

Not much really

A bit of a nuisance to keep putting in on - and then you have to focus manually; which resulted quite often in poor quality photos

As expected

While it's a shame that picture and sound quality haven't been upgraded, the iPhone 13 was great in these regards and the iPhone 14 is, too Excellent display Admirable headphone performance Solid build quality No upgrades to picture or sound Familiar design Notch is still present

Apple's latest non-Pro iPhone is superb - it's just that it's strikingly similar to last year's effort.

Still an incredible smartphone, Brilliant battery life gets a bit better, Excellent camera system gets a bit better

Last year’s Pro hardware, Wireless charging slow by modern standards, No USB-C; it’s now well overdue

As represented above, Canon offers a huge range of prime (fixed focal length) lenses. Options range from ultra-wide angle through super telephoto and from tilt-shift through macro. There is a lens for practically every need included here.

by Jeff Medkeff

Works verry good with the 300 mm F2.8 L IS USM II and the 70-200 mm F2.8 L IS USM II . Sharp pictures and AF works excellent. http://www.panoramio.com/user/971669 http://www.hdr-photography.be

Cons

Works verry good with the 300 mm F2.8 L IS USM II and the 70-200 mm F2.8 L IS USM II

Tested this like 5 weeks ago. The Extender 2x III performs better on my 70-200L IS Mk2 than on the Mk1. There is a noticable difference in AF and IQ. I had them side by side. The Extender 2x III gave no improvement on the 70-200L IS Mk1 over the Extender 2x II. I got the Extender 2x III in the end.

Good build; good image quality; still fast AF

price

We reviewed the Canon 400mm ƒ/5.6L USM back in 2008, which makes a good candidate for comparison with the 200mm ƒ/2.8L USM and 2x Extender attached. In terms of sharpness, the two are quite similar: the 400mm is slightly better at ƒ/5.6 and ƒ/16, but at ƒ/8 and ƒ/11, they're almost identical.