It’s a great handset, but the improvements are so iterative that most of you will hardly notice what’s new.

Action mode offers truly superb video stabilization. eSIM makes it easy to switch phones (with other iPhones). Satellite SOS and Crash Detection add peace of mind.

Many of the specs remain the same as on the iPhone 13. Small battery gains. Photonic Engine isn’t as revolutionary as suggested.

I have a hard time getting good shots when mounted to my canon 70-200 f2.8 mkII. Was hoping for more.

Slightly better cameras but otherwise, not much of an update - buy the iPhone 14 Pro or switch to Android instead

Better low-light photography, Slightly longer battery life, Action mode gives super stabilised video

The same performance as the iPhone 13, No Dynamic Island or Always-On display, 60Hz screen

Fantastic replacement to an expensive lens but the lens is expensive for a good reason. In almost every camera, the auto focus stops working with the 2xiii. So unless your eyesight is 6/6 unlike mine, chances are that not every shot you take will be sharp. With a loss of a couple of f stops too.

Only just arrived and am exceptionally happy with the clarity & extra distance I get from using this. So looking forward to heading into the Bush to capture wild life.

As represented above, Canon offers a huge range of prime (fixed focal length) lenses. Options range from ultra-wide angle through super telephoto and from tilt-shift through macro. There is a lens for practically every need included here.

by Jeff Medkeff

Works verry good with the 300 mm F2.8 L IS USM II and the 70-200 mm F2.8 L IS USM II . Sharp pictures and AF works excellent. http://www.panoramio.com/user/971669 http://www.hdr-photography.be

Cons

Works verry good with the 300 mm F2.8 L IS USM II and the 70-200 mm F2.8 L IS USM II

Tested this like 5 weeks ago. The Extender 2x III performs better on my 70-200L IS Mk2 than on the Mk1. There is a noticable difference in AF and IQ. I had them side by side. The Extender 2x III gave no improvement on the 70-200L IS Mk1 over the Extender 2x II. I got the Extender 2x III in the end.

Good build; good image quality; still fast AF

price

We reviewed the Canon 400mm ƒ/5.6L USM back in 2008, which makes a good candidate for comparison with the 200mm ƒ/2.8L USM and 2x Extender attached. In terms of sharpness, the two are quite similar: the 400mm is slightly better at ƒ/5.6 and ƒ/16, but at ƒ/8 and ƒ/11, they're almost identical.